From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: looking for NTEmacs binary optimized for i586 Date: 11 Mar 2005 06:08:06 -0800 Message-ID: References: <1110458030.018565.51970@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com> <1130m78j5gk5ub6@corp.supernews.com> <1110540171.054967.184650@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1110550281 11291 80.91.229.2 (11 Mar 2005 14:11:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 14:11:21 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 11 15:11:21 2005 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D9kqu-0007eX-P3 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 15:10:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D9l60-0002hn-9n for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 09:26:32 -0500 Original-Path: shelby.stanford.edu!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help Original-Lines: 7 Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: physics.stanford.edu Original-X-Trace: news.Stanford.EDU 1110550087 21154 171.64.107.180 (11 Mar 2005 14:08:07 GMT) Original-X-Complaints-To: news@news.stanford.edu User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Original-Xref: shelby.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.help:129218 Original-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org X-MailScanner-To: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:24768 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.help:24768 > this is the version I'm currently using. Are you sure that it's > optimized for i586+? I don't think so. But why do you want i586 binaries, really? For an application like Emacs, which doesn't do any funny stuff like heavy-duty number crunching, the performance improvement over binaries optimized for i386 should be utterly negligible.