From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Icon displayed wrong Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 19:13:46 -0400 Message-ID: References: <92odkh9za2.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <464ECB33.1050102@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1179616438 3013 80.91.229.12 (19 May 2007 23:13:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 23:13:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, cloos@jhcloos.com, Jason Rumney To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun May 20 01:13:57 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HpY7Y-0005OL-Mo for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 20 May 2007 01:13:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HpY7Y-0007oI-5T for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 19 May 2007 19:13:56 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HpY7U-0007o3-40 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 May 2007 19:13:52 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HpY7T-0007nr-Mz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 May 2007 19:13:51 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HpY7T-0007no-He for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 May 2007 19:13:51 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HpY7T-0000ve-CK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 May 2007 19:13:51 -0400 Original-Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=localhost) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HpY7P-0001Yq-2m; Sat, 19 May 2007 19:13:47 -0400 X-Spook: emc munitions Exon Shell terrorist Echelon $400 million X-Ran: mA~Z'V (Richard Stallman's message of "Sat, 19 May 2007 18:31:49 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:71406 Archived-At: Richard Stallman wrote: > Is the inconsistency in icon style visible in the version that will be > Emacs 22.1? Does it look bad? If you compile an Emacs with very limited image support, so that it uses the pbm versions of the icons rather than the xpm versions, the toolbar looks fine. The "odd" icons (eg copy.pbm) that have a slightly different file type look exactly the same as the other icons. So I think there is no problem. It's only tidyness that motivates us to make them all exactly the same file type.