From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: dkcombs@panix.com (David Combs) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: mode-line now has WAY fewer items on it! eg follow-mode Date: 9 Oct 2013 05:26:22 -0400 Organization: PANIX -- Public Access Networks Corp. Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1381311014 13314 80.91.229.3 (9 Oct 2013 09:30:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 09:30:14 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 09 11:30:18 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VTq5y-0008F6-Bz for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 11:30:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40856 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VTq5x-0001KG-Ml for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 05:30:17 -0400 Original-Path: usenet.stanford.edu!panix!panix2.panix.com!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help Original-Lines: 13 Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: panix2.panix.com Original-X-Trace: reader1.panix.com 1381310782 518 166.84.1.2 (9 Oct 2013 09:26:22 GMT) Original-X-Complaints-To: abuse@panix.com Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 09:26:22 +0000 (UTC) Original-Xref: usenet.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.help:201615 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:93885 Archived-At: I've noticed that version 24.2.1 of emacs no longer puts useful things like follow-mode on the mode line. Even an abbreviation would be better than nothing: follow rather than follow-mode, say. Of foll. Work-arounds? Thanks, David