From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15991: 24.3.50; Wishlist: Make test suite user-friendlier Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 11:57:36 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83pppk8f91.fsf@gnu.org> <87lhsjvgsa.fsf@gmx.de> <6osimru0uw.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87tx76stnl.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1403884694 11082 80.91.229.3 (27 Jun 2014 15:58:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 15:58:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 15991@debbugs.gnu.org To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 27 17:58:07 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1X0YXP-0005Ld-Dy for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 17:58:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51154 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X0YXP-0001sq-5I for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 11:58:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52557) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X0YXL-0001s2-Ht for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 11:58:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X0YXK-0008Hl-7U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 11:58:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:44009) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X0YXK-0008Hh-52 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 11:58:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X0YXJ-0002Nn-Rc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 11:58:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 15:58:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 15991 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 15991-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B15991.14038846609123 (code B ref 15991); Fri, 27 Jun 2014 15:58:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 15991) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jun 2014 15:57:40 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35159 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X0YWx-0002N5-S8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 11:57:40 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:60813 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X0YWw-0002Mw-3C for 15991@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 11:57:38 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X0YWu-00078I-VR; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 11:57:37 -0400 X-Spook: BCCI SCUD missile csim domestic disruption Blowpipe CDC X-Ran: H7YSm&2Zx-Tl=2Mf_#C8@vBE_tlVaem'Jh^~>PH{G8WC+$|tS_j8 X-Hue: white X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <87tx76stnl.fsf@gmx.de> (Michael Albinus's message of "Fri, 27 Jun 2014 09:23:10 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:90899 Archived-At: Michael Albinus wrote: > I believe it is desirable to run the tests unconditionally when invoked > via make. People call "make check" for a reason. I suppose you are right, and this is consistent with how it used to behave. > Maybe you could even offer the test package name as target. Then one > could call "make -C test/automated tramp-tests", You can already do make -C test/automated tramp-tests.log I don't think removing the ".log" is worth it. > There is another issue. By redirecting the output to a file, the > password prompt for tramp-tests isn't visible anymore. This is a real > regression, because these tests are intended to run for different remote > file names. Could you pipe the test output through tee or something like > this? I don't know how portable this would be, 'tho. Not sure I understand. Do you want to interact, ie type a password? I think tests that require interaction are a Bad Thing. Are these optional tests that do not normally run?