From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16548: 24.3; remove "buffer has clients" prompt Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 15:34:55 -0500 Message-ID: References: <52E3AF62.3040701@poczta.onet.pl> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1390682109 28212 80.91.229.3 (25 Jan 2014 20:35:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 20:35:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16548@debbugs.gnu.org To: Jarek Czekalski Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 25 21:35:16 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W79wh-0004rs-Fn for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 21:35:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52475 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W79wh-0001Fy-39 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 15:35:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48716) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W79wZ-0001CY-D1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 15:35:12 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W79wU-0006Wx-Rn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 15:35:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:50156) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W79wU-0006WE-Hk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 15:35:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W79wU-0002oG-BW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 15:35:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 20:35:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16548 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16548-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16548.139068209810791 (code B ref 16548); Sat, 25 Jan 2014 20:35:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16548) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jan 2014 20:34:58 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35942 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W79wQ-0002ny-Br for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 15:34:58 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:49161) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W79wO-0002nr-UM for 16548@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 15:34:57 -0500 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W79wN-0004es-Gl; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 15:34:55 -0500 X-Spook: security gamma Maple Firefly UMTS Guantanamo Europol X-Ran: gXQ&VBR.F*4!/8T4nt)zFBnwughlyq|jp/[XHzKMuL}W?GN+q:COm#>Zer@\s{6b?UoMNw X-Hue: magenta X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <52E3AF62.3040701@poczta.onet.pl> (Jarek Czekalski's message of "Sat, 25 Jan 2014 13:34:42 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:84014 Archived-At: Jarek Czekalski wrote: > I suggest to remove the "buffer has clients" prompt completely. > If the buffer was not modified, it would close at once. > > I want to prepare a patch, but may it be applied for 24.4, > despite feature freeze? IMO such a change is not appropriate at this time.