From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#2228: 23.0.90; rmail-cease-edit ignores changes to the message headers Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 15:43:04 -0500 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: Glenn Morris , 2228@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1234127107 31403 80.91.229.12 (8 Feb 2009 21:05:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 21:05:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 2228@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 08 22:06:20 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LWGpz-0006xO-VC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 22:05:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38854 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LWGog-000638-UN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 16:03:50 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LWGoU-0005zh-AC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 16:03:38 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LWGoR-0005xh-Ki for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 16:03:38 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=39971 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LWGoR-0005xY-G2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 16:03:35 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:42102) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LWGoQ-0007zw-Mt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 16:03:34 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n18L3W2e026951; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 13:03:32 -0800 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id n18Ko4XO023603; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 12:50:04 -0800 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Glenn Morris Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs , Rmail Maintainers Resent-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 20:50:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 2228 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs,rmail X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 2228-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B2228.123412590422386 (code B ref 2228); Sun, 08 Feb 2009 20:50:04 +0000 Original-Received: (at 2228) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 8 Feb 2009 20:45:04 +0000 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n18Kj1HO022219 for <2228@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 12:45:02 -0800 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1LWGUb-0001fh-02; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 15:43:05 -0500 X-Spook: satellite imagery Delta Force Ruby Ridge Kh-11 SDI SCUD X-Ran: 5+00G2^0i:gD9}1@NtU{T3g)j9nZ(b=^NJX"T@Wlkucc+%I38z$}3rg-f0T79'~Yu*SQHO X-Hue: magenta X-Attribution: GM User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 16:03:38 -0500 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:25058 Archived-At: Richard M Stallman wrote: > If one invokes rmail-edit, and edits the headers of the message, the > changes to the headers are not copied back to the original message > held in rmail-buffer. The effect is that your edits of the headers > are lost after you type "C-c C-c" to exit rmail-edit. > > I never got around to writing the code to copy header edits into the > original message. Perhaps the easiest way to do it is to put the "old > version" into a buffer and compare the edited headers with the old > headers. I think that editing a message should present the message with headers expanded. In which case I don't see why changing the header would be any different to changing the body.