From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: uzibalqa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: [External] : Running emacs without any customisation Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2022 14:18:27 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87r0zc4vf8.fsf@web.de> <87edvceeph.fsf@yahoo.com> <875ygoedjr.fsf@yahoo.com> <871qrceb1r.fsf@yahoo.com> <82r0zbkegq.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="38211"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: pquessev@gmail.com Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 13 16:28:24 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oizCB-0009kp-QN for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 16:28:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51848 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oizCA-00076y-4v for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 10:28:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39618) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oiz2p-0007ii-Hc for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 10:18:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-40141.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.141]:46653) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oiz2m-0007tY-82 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 10:18:43 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=proton.me; s=protonmail; t=1665670717; x=1665929917; bh=qfxA2RtFPmMdrJh4m9gqfmiCNvu7UVwIpHiowZUor/U=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID; b=HhWuM0jPTMw/tRBtrn00hVpqEEKOsvYbXoBAjXJxTVkd8LXNWRk6JQOLT9mqIsg/a ljSnkQRfBbKnz/iwkE8Tx7m/D6y46nbHCcC1K4iqPsrx6Q9Tuwny7fvRgDEeOtNW3T bOoEbv1CoA5JCYtRkdh8VIrKpuwLR7oEk15YvomGSYYImEkXGrT+TEqASbeGC4HmDh A5i3GgyKIWuvUn+59DrNTv9DqzX+/7/BDX376qMQCwBEv3i7XYDuPimcmrGiD+MSDf Lfna178ZBpOI1/MkpWKvkjSTIVmYfQKeJ2ULlvg/CmJTQPNNHYx4aX/UkKSga3prLI xFxQSwIdiDorw== In-Reply-To: <82r0zbkegq.fsf@gmail.com> Feedback-ID: 52887082:user:proton Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.70.40.141; envelope-from=uzibalqa@proton.me; helo=mail-40141.protonmail.ch X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:139902 Archived-At: ------- Original Message ------- On Thursday, October 13th, 2022 at 2:03 PM, Pascal Quesseveur wrote: > > "u" =3D=3D uzibalqa uzibalqa@proton.me writes: >=20 >=20 > u> No. I think there is no option but to remove everything. And I >=20 > u> do not know repercussions there might be. My plan was only to >=20 > u> remove the EMACS ones. >=20 >=20 > Perhaps you can use xrdq -query -all and redirect output in a file, > remove lines in that file that can affect emacs, reload the file with > xrdb -load ant then launch emacs. So you don't remove all resources > from your database. Step by step you can find the resources that cause > problems. When it's ok you can save the resources file. =20 Hello Pascal. Someone said that other parameters besides those tagged EMAC= S could affect emacs configuration. All this discussion stems from the probl= em\ that things are not completely understood or made fully understandable. It= 's a=20 possible approach nonetheless. Have been asking what could happen if I rem= ove all x-resource setting from the database. Would you reckon serious repercussio= ns, a=20 user might not be aware he is doing? > -- > Pascal Quesseveur > pquessev@gmail.com