From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: How are Windows users supposed to print the PostScript refcards? Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 22:18:29 -0400 Message-ID: References: <873aysl28i.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87myx0z2ht.fsf@lrde.org> <87odhcfexo.fsf@lrde.org> <87d4xrg0sz.fsf@lrde.org> <874pizdccu.fsf@lrde.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1187576082 5744 80.91.229.12 (20 Aug 2007 02:14:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 02:14:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Micha=EBl?= Cadilhac , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Richard Stallman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 20 04:14:38 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IMwmp-0006W0-Rr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Aug 2007 04:14:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IMwmo-0004jY-TG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Aug 2007 22:14:34 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IMwml-0004hp-0a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Aug 2007 22:14:31 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IMwmk-0004h9-FI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Aug 2007 22:14:30 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IMwmk-0004gz-Ch for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Aug 2007 22:14:30 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IMwmk-0002Q8-Cz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Aug 2007 22:14:30 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IMwqb-0004LH-41; Sun, 19 Aug 2007 22:18:29 -0400 X-Spook: argus codes EuroFed AIEWS SCUD missile counter X-Ran: g^u,h_:nJYv+UVB#.fP__:vbu5Q\A5gmwxG`w!#1~fdXVj&5.Fg["O?}'o)r8}7 (Reiner Steib's message of "Fri, 17 Aug 2007 10:35:15 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:76795 Archived-At: Reiner Steib wrote: > How about adding PDF versions now for 22.2+ and the trunk now and > decide about removing PS before releasing Emacs 23.1 (adding a note in > the Makefile or FOR-RELEASE? Personally I think that's a waste of time and disk space. I would just change them all to pdf now and be done with it. Some of them never had any ps version in CVS at all, just the tex, and no-one ever complained, AFAIK. pdf is better for Windows and Mac (AFAIK), and any sane GNU/Linux system can handle pdf or tex just fine.