From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15876: 24.3.50; Highly degraded performance between rev 114715 and 115006 Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 22:05:18 -0500 Message-ID: References: <867gcdiqji.fsf@somewhere.org> <86fvr09z55.fsf@somewhere.org> <83fvr01du4.fsf@gnu.org> <8638n0nj9p.fsf@somewhere.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1384398365 23720 80.91.229.3 (14 Nov 2013 03:06:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 03:06:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 15876@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Sebastien Vauban" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 14 04:06:09 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VgnFw-0005OB-Fy for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 04:06:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53021 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VgnFv-0003Jk-R4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 22:06:07 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44811) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VgnFr-0003Jf-LC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 22:06:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VgnFq-0000zw-M0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 22:06:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:37025) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VgnFq-0000zs-IT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 22:06:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VgnFq-0002y0-9N for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 22:06:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 03:06:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 15876 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 15876-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B15876.138439832211329 (code B ref 15876); Thu, 14 Nov 2013 03:06:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 15876) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Nov 2013 03:05:22 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51044 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VgnFC-0002we-8Y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 22:05:22 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:53081 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VgnF9-0002wW-Tb for 15876@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 22:05:20 -0500 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VgnF8-0002um-U1; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 22:05:18 -0500 X-Spook: 9/11 Bruxelles terrorist Khaddafi pink noise X-Ran: BQI7G'k}VVdmW38pJ@eytg:]oQE(?Z*1mG)aC^0NPT@qu6xSw<>}H?yXl@hk_^I@/B[.}\ X-Hue: magenta X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <8638n0nj9p.fsf@somewhere.org> (Sebastien Vauban's message of "Wed, 13 Nov 2013 21:23:14 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:80403 Archived-At: "Sebastien Vauban" wrote: > BTW, I was expecting it to be so, as I'm using a Git copy of Org [1] -- this > was not said in my mail. Hence, if a change in Org was responsible for the > problem, I *should* have it in both Emacs versions or not at all, no? What this for sure would mean is that it is pointless to report it here, as opposed to the Org list. Although you originally said: > What's become slow: > - movements (, , etc.) in Org files > - movements (, , etc.) in mails > - maybe other stuff (not yet tested) I don't see how point 2 can be Org-related. But then I have no idea what setup you are using. If you think Emacs is generally slow, then please post a recipe starting from emacs -Q that shows the problem, preferably not involving Org (since it has many moving parts). If you think your git copy of Org has become slower, then talk to the Org mailing list.