From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: progress reporting again Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 14:26:38 -0500 Message-ID: References: <200411151813.44859.pogonyshev@gmx.net> <200411171539.21963.pogonyshev@gmx.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1100719683 26135 80.91.229.6 (17 Nov 2004 19:28:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 19:28:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Harald Maier , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 17 20:27:46 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CUVSz-000806-00 for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 20:27:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CUVbn-0006zS-Jg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 14:36:51 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CUVbg-0006yy-0k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 14:36:44 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CUVbf-0006yZ-6Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 14:36:43 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CUVbf-0006yW-33 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 14:36:43 -0500 Original-Received: from [132.204.24.67] (helo=mercure.iro.umontreal.ca) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CUVS5-0000wZ-Mi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 14:26:49 -0500 Original-Received: from hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.50]) by mercure.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AFD08282D4; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 14:26:49 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from asado.iro.umontreal.ca (asado.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.24.84]) by hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FD504AC45D; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 14:26:39 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: by asado.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id CB4FE8CA69; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 14:26:38 -0500 (EST) Original-To: Paul Pogonyshev In-Reply-To: <200411171539.21963.pogonyshev@gmx.net> (Paul Pogonyshev's message of "Wed, 17 Nov 2004 15:39:21 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-DIRO-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-DIRO-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-DIRO-MailScanner-SpamCheck: n'est pas un polluriel, SpamAssassin (score=0, requis 5) X-MailScanner-From: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:29984 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:29984 >> > Can anyone who uses SES mode check if the following patch works >> > fine? I think it is generally a good idea to unify progress >> > reporting as much as possible in Emacs. >> > >> > I didn't touch `ses-time-check' function, since progress messages >> > used with it are non-standard. >> >> Unfortunately, I got the following error: >> >> Debugger entered--Lisp error: (void-function row) >> row(3) >> ses-setup() >> ses-mode() >> ... Probably becuse you've compiled ses.el with an Emacs that uses an old subr.el. You have to follow the steps: - recompile subr.el. - redump your Emacs. - recompile ses.el. > This is very strange, because I don't get this neither with > your file, nor with a locally created junk/test file. Can > you please try to understand what's wrong? Since it doesn't > complain about `dotimes-with-progress-reporter' being unknown, > the macro is evaluated. But it fails to expand it... No, it's not expanded. Evaluation of the arguments takes place before the funcall, so you first get the `row' error before even getting a chance to complain that the "function" dotimes-with-progress-reporter is a macro. Stefan