From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Fwd: mouse-4/mouse-5 loses click modifiers Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 12:42:29 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1184690602 13733 80.91.229.12 (17 Jul 2007 16:43:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:43:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 17 18:43:20 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IAq8p-0005AN-M6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 18:43:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IAq8p-0003LJ-Ap for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 12:43:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IAq8B-0002oL-MD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 12:42:35 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IAq89-0002nP-UN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 12:42:35 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IAq89-0002nI-Na for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 12:42:33 -0400 Original-Received: from tomts10.bellnexxia.net ([209.226.175.54] helo=tomts10-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IAq86-0007VN-7E; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 12:42:30 -0400 Original-Received: from pastel.home ([70.53.195.169]) by tomts10-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.13 201-253-122-130-113-20050324) with ESMTP id <20070717164229.UZSU9197.tomts10-srv.bellnexxia.net@pastel.home>; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 12:42:29 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 0EC738014; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 12:42:28 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Tue\, 17 Jul 2007 11\:05\:46 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: Solaris 8 (1) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:75001 Archived-At: > Please, Richard, don't do "forward", but "reply" instead. > Pretty please? > I think it is better to use reply so as to save people the trouble of > looking for the data in another message. But if people generally > agree that this doesn't help them, I don't mind using forward instead. I think you meant it the other way around. In any case, which command you use actually doesn't matter so much. I agree that it's good to keep a copy of the original text, but that can be done with `reply' as well. All I care about, really is that the "In-reply-to" (and/or the "References") field in the header make it easy to recover the original. Stefan