From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
To: "Miles Bader" <miles@gnu.org>
Cc: Emacs-Devel <emacs-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: face-remapping patch
Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 22:54:55 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <jwvzlqbi23o.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fc339e4a0805261949l6c1395c1s588949ae3232de99@mail.gmail.com> (Miles Bader's message of "Tue, 27 May 2008 11:49:15 +0900")
> I've attached my face-remapping patch to this message (I needed to
> untangle it from some other changes).
> I've used regularly in my personal emacs for many years, and in light
> testing the patch seems to work fine against the current trunk.
It looks pretty good. Is there any reason why you added redundant tests
like !NILP (Vface_remapping_alist)? I'd expect at least in my case that
face-remapping-alist would almost never be nil so this extra test would
end up redundant.
Stefan
> +int
> +lookup_named_face (f, symbol, signal_p)
> + struct frame *f;
> + Lisp_Object symbol;
> + int signal_p;
> +{
> + return lookup_named_face_1 (f, symbol, 0);
> +}
Why have a `signal_p' arg that's not used?
Also, the ChangeLog entry doesn't make much sense:
(lookup_named_face_1): Renamed from `lookup_named_face'. Add
`signal_p' argument. Pass new last arg to `get_lface_attributes', and
return -1 if it fails.
(lookup_named_face): Redefined in terms of `lookup_named_face_1'.
The signal_p arg was there before, it's not added. Am I missing something?
> + switch (face_id)
> + {
> + case DEFAULT_FACE_ID: name = Qdefault; break;
> + case MODE_LINE_FACE_ID: name = Qmode_line; break;
> + case MODE_LINE_INACTIVE_FACE_ID: name = Qmode_line_inactive; break;
> + case HEADER_LINE_FACE_ID: name = Qheader_line; break;
> + case TOOL_BAR_FACE_ID: name = Qtool_bar; break;
> + case FRINGE_FACE_ID: name = Qfringe; break;
> + case SCROLL_BAR_FACE_ID: name = Qscroll_bar; break;
> + case BORDER_FACE_ID: name = Qborder; break;
> + case CURSOR_FACE_ID: name = Qcursor; break;
> + case MOUSE_FACE_ID: name = Qmouse; break;
> + case MENU_FACE_ID: name = Qmenu; break;
> +
> + default:
> + return face_id; /* Give up. */
Does this default case correspond to a bug? if so shouldn't it `abort'?
If not, shouldn't it obey Vface_remapping_alist?
> + mapping = assq_no_quit (name, Vface_remapping_alist);
> + if (NILP (mapping))
> + return face_id; /* Give up. */
> +
> + remapped_face_id = lookup_named_face_1 (f, name, 0);
This looks odd: we look up Vface_remapping_alist and then ignore the
actual result (other than its being null or not). Is it just an
optimization to avoid calling lookup_named_face_1? If so, a comment is
in order.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-28 2:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-27 2:49 face-remapping patch Miles Bader
2008-05-28 2:03 ` Florian Beck
2008-05-28 2:31 ` Miles Bader
2008-05-29 1:38 ` Richard M Stallman
2008-05-28 2:54 ` Stefan Monnier [this message]
2008-05-28 3:30 ` Miles Bader
2008-05-28 7:22 ` David Reitter
2008-05-28 7:29 ` Miles Bader
2008-05-28 8:05 ` Miles Bader
2008-05-28 9:30 ` David Kastrup
2008-05-28 13:13 ` Miles Bader
2008-05-28 13:33 ` David Kastrup
2008-05-28 9:33 ` David Reitter
2008-05-28 13:21 ` Miles Bader
2008-05-28 14:33 ` David Reitter
2008-05-28 19:25 ` Face realization (was: face-remapping patch) Stefan Monnier
2008-05-28 19:54 ` David Reitter
2008-05-29 15:25 ` Face realization Stefan Monnier
2008-05-28 19:25 ` face-remapping patch Stefan Monnier
2008-05-28 20:21 ` David Kastrup
2008-05-28 20:31 ` David Kastrup
2008-05-29 6:02 ` tomas
2008-05-29 18:14 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2008-05-29 22:15 ` David Kastrup
2008-05-30 4:48 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2008-05-30 13:32 ` Richard M Stallman
2008-05-30 13:50 ` David Kastrup
2008-05-31 15:17 ` Richard M Stallman
2008-05-31 15:38 ` David Kastrup
2008-06-01 14:03 ` Richard M Stallman
2008-05-29 10:25 ` Richard M Stallman
2008-05-29 11:14 ` David Kastrup
2008-05-29 15:45 ` Specifiers (was: face-remapping patch) Stefan Monnier
2008-05-29 16:21 ` Specifiers David Kastrup
2008-05-29 17:36 ` Specifiers Stefan Monnier
2008-05-29 18:17 ` Specifiers Stephen J. Turnbull
2008-05-30 2:08 ` Specifiers (was: face-remapping patch) Richard M Stallman
2008-05-30 2:21 ` Specifiers Stefan Monnier
2008-05-30 5:31 ` Specifiers David Kastrup
2008-05-30 14:10 ` Specifiers Stefan Monnier
2008-05-30 14:14 ` Specifiers David Kastrup
2008-05-30 15:11 ` Specifiers Stefan Monnier
2008-05-31 15:16 ` Specifiers Richard M Stallman
2008-05-29 15:56 ` face-remapping patch Stefan Monnier
2008-05-29 16:27 ` David Kastrup
2008-05-29 8:47 ` Miles Bader
2008-05-29 15:59 ` Stefan Monnier
2008-05-29 18:28 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-05-30 3:42 ` Miles Bader
2008-05-28 14:46 ` Chong Yidong
2008-05-28 14:57 ` David Reitter
2008-05-28 16:33 ` Miles Bader
2008-05-30 15:10 ` Chong Yidong
2008-06-01 2:43 ` Miles Bader
2008-05-28 16:37 ` Dan Nicolaescu
2008-05-28 17:45 ` Miles Bader
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=jwvzlqbi23o.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org \
--to=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=miles@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.