Re: Why `lisp' and `shortlisp'

[Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>]

>> Can someone explain to me why we have both `lisp' and `shortlisp' in
>> src/Makefile.in?  It appears to contain the same list of files, so
>> I can't understand how it would make sense to sometimes refer to them
>> via ../lisp and sometimes via ${lispsource}.

> I wondered about this too. Perhaps:

> $lisp specifies the full path for those who build in a different directory.
> $shortlisp is needed for the comment above the rule for DOC:

> /* We run make-docfile twice because the command line may get too long
>    on some systems.  */

> Perhaps $shortlisp is (more likely, was) needed to avoid overflowing
> the command-line limit on "some" systems. Generating it from $lisp via
> eg sed would have the same problem.

But if `shortlisp' works, why use `lisp'?


        Stefan