From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: point-min and 1 Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:13:55 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83vdkvjbet.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1250003667 26308 80.91.229.12 (11 Aug 2009 15:14:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 15:14:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 11 17:14:17 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Mat3D-0000lP-RQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 17:14:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47613 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mat3C-000555-8C for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:14:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mat36-00054m-MP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:14:04 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mat31-00054A-9g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:14:03 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=58247 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mat31-000547-3w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:13:59 -0400 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:48612) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mat2z-0003hr-4Z; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:13:57 -0400 Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (faina.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.26.177]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id n7BFDte4024480; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:13:56 -0400 Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id C5C723A0B7; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:13:55 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <83vdkvjbet.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 11 Aug 2009 06:07:38 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV3337=0 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:114066 Archived-At: >> ;; Move to the specified line number in that buffer. >> (save-restriction >> (widen) >> - (goto-char 1) >> + (goto-char (point-min)) > Can `(goto-char (point-min))' be different from `(goto-char 1)' after > a call to `widen'? No, indeed it can't in Emacs, which is why the change is guaranteed to be correct. Stefan