From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r99829: * help.el Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2010 20:37:40 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1270514276 27055 80.91.229.12 (6 Apr 2010 00:37:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 00:37:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 06 02:37:55 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nywni-0002KX-FC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 02:37:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55678 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nywnh-00051L-8v for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 20:37:53 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Nywnb-00051G-Og for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 20:37:47 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=38936 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NywnX-000518-R4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 20:37:47 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NywnW-00008P-93 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 20:37:43 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:36742 helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NywnV-00008I-UN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 20:37:42 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAM4eukvO+K6K/2dsb2JhbACbTHK4VYUHBIsq X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.51,368,1267419600"; d="scan'208";a="60261279" Original-Received: from 206-248-174-138.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([206.248.174.138]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP; 05 Apr 2010 20:37:40 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id ADC2E8053; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 20:37:40 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Mon, 5 Apr 2010 21:45:28 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:123234 Archived-At: >> That's a problem of the comment itself, not of where it's placed. > No, the comment is accurately describing why I did the change. Then, there's no need to change its content, only its place. > But it's not worth discussing this; If you're talking about discussing the comment's content, I fully agree. All I'm interested in is discussing the comment's *place*, which in this case should be in the code rather than (or additionally to) in the ChangeLog. > I'll change it. I don't care too much about this part, actually. But feel free to change it if you feel like it. Stefan