From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
To: Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Combining face and map stuff
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2010 01:43:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <jwvzkusqkn7.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8739slfqg6.fsf@catnip.gol.com> (Miles Bader's message of "Tue, 05 Oct 2010 09:12:09 +0900")
>>> It sounds like he's saying it would use their union, with a
>>> property-specific function used to compute that union.
>>> [and that the union computation could be done at "property setting time"
>>> rather than at display time, to avoid speed problems.]
>> I'm probably missing something here: if the union is computed at
>> put-text-property time, then how is this different from what we have
>> now? That union will have all the properties of the character lumped
>> together, just like what we have now, right? What am I missing?
You're missing that in order o properly update the merge when some
property is added/removed in a plane, all users of text properties will
have to follow some new conventions.
Of course, those conventions could be enforced via defadvices, I guess.
But there's probably going to be some slightly subtle issues: when
setting the `face' property, we can assume it's in the default nil
plane, but reading the `face' property might mean "the `face' property
in the nil plane" or "the merged `face' property".
> Who knows, maybe it _could_ be implemented completely in lisp given
> todays primitives ... but in order to make the layering thing work,
> all the users would need to cooperate, presumably by means of
> a wrapper layer.
Right.
Actually, that's why I like this idea: most of the work is done at
a time when Elisp can be used, so you get a lot of flexibility, and you
don't have to worry about interaction with tricky C code.
E.g. maybe the merge function could be used to enforce priorities
between planes, or to enable/disable planes (kind of like
add-to-invisibility-spec).
Stefan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-05 23:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-02 14:21 Combining face and map stuff Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2010-10-02 16:21 ` Chong Yidong
2010-10-02 16:41 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2010-10-03 2:04 ` Miles Bader
2010-10-03 4:16 ` Chong Yidong
2010-10-03 13:08 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2010-10-03 23:37 ` Stefan Monnier
2010-10-04 7:56 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-10-04 9:03 ` Miles Bader
2010-10-04 9:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-10-05 0:12 ` Miles Bader
2010-10-05 23:43 ` Stefan Monnier [this message]
2010-10-06 3:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-10-07 7:40 ` Stefan Monnier
2010-10-07 13:56 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-10-07 18:08 ` Stefan Monnier
2010-10-12 19:09 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-10-12 20:23 ` Stefan Monnier
2010-10-13 11:41 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-10-13 12:42 ` Stefan Monnier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=jwvzkusqkn7.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org \
--to=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=miles@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.