* display-buffer-reuse-frames default to t
@ 2011-01-19 16:04 Stefan Monnier
2011-01-19 16:11 ` Eli Zaretskii
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Monnier @ 2011-01-19 16:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-devel
Any objection to defaulting display-buffer-reuse-framesto t?
Stefan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: display-buffer-reuse-frames default to t
2011-01-19 16:04 display-buffer-reuse-frames default to t Stefan Monnier
@ 2011-01-19 16:11 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-01-19 21:00 ` Stefan Monnier
2011-01-19 16:25 ` Andreas Schwab
2011-01-19 19:15 ` Tassilo Horn
2 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2011-01-19 16:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Monnier; +Cc: emacs-devel
> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
> Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 11:04:41 -0500
>
> Any objection to defaulting display-buffer-reuse-framesto t?
What does it do on a tty (with more than one frame)?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: display-buffer-reuse-frames default to t
2011-01-19 16:04 display-buffer-reuse-frames default to t Stefan Monnier
2011-01-19 16:11 ` Eli Zaretskii
@ 2011-01-19 16:25 ` Andreas Schwab
2011-01-19 16:44 ` martin rudalics
2011-01-19 20:59 ` Stefan Monnier
2011-01-19 19:15 ` Tassilo Horn
2 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Schwab @ 2011-01-19 16:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Monnier; +Cc: emacs-devel
Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
> Any objection to defaulting display-buffer-reuse-framesto t?
Does it restrict itself to visible frames?
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: display-buffer-reuse-frames default to t
2011-01-19 16:04 display-buffer-reuse-frames default to t Stefan Monnier
2011-01-19 16:11 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-01-19 16:25 ` Andreas Schwab
@ 2011-01-19 19:15 ` Tassilo Horn
2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Tassilo Horn @ 2011-01-19 19:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Monnier; +Cc: emacs-devel
Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
Hi!
> Any objection to defaulting display-buffer-reuse-frames to t?
I used that a while ago (or the ido-variable that does the same) and was
not satisfied, because it frequently occured that the buffer to be
displayed was in an iconified frame, or on a TTY linux console frame, or
in a frame on another desktop/workspace, or, with newer KDEs, it might
be in another activity...
So as long as it cannot be guaranteed that the buffer really becomes
visible for a user, I'd vote against it.
Bye,
Tassilo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: display-buffer-reuse-frames default to t
@ 2011-01-19 18:48 MON KEY
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: MON KEY @ 2011-01-19 18:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-devel
Cc: martin rudalics, Eli Zaretskii, Andreas Schwab, Stefan Monnier
>>> Any objection to defaulting display-buffer-reuse-framesto t?
>>
>> Does it restrict itself to visible frames?
>
> No. It can use iconified frames.
>
> Ideally, one would set this to 0, 'visible, or t and get the desired
> effect. That's what I do on my branch.
Is the suggestion to extend the range of acceptable values for
`display-buffer-reuse-frames'?
IMHO there is opportunity here for some much needed changes[1].
Indeed, it would make more sense to extend the range of values allowed
to any one of: { t nil 0 visible }
I would also suggest adding `selected-frame' as an option for
consistency with `display-buffer's provision for a "specific frame" as
argument to its FRAME parameter.
Such change would require changing the custom type declaration of
`display-buffer-reuse-frames' from:
:type 'boolean ;; Is the declaration even correct now?
Likewise, if such change(s) are made _please_ ensure that the
variable's docstring indicate explicitly the range of possible values
and their affect on frame/buffer display, i.e. don't just punt to
`display-buffer' with a "which see".
Maybe, better is to implement an additional/alternative variable:
`display-buffer-reuse-frames-if-graphic'
which inherits its defaults according to `display-buffer-reuse-frames'
and `pop-up-frames'?
As it is now, the current docstring of `display-buffer-reuse-frames'
is poorly specified wrt to the interaction of `display-buffer' around
`pop-up-frames' and `display-graphic-p'. Likely many users are
left with an essentially opaque customization option which often fails
to DTRT esp. where third-party authors using `display-buffer' in an
ill adapted position to appropriately accomodate user display
customizations, cf the recent report bug 7728:
(URL `http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=7728')
and discussion of `save-window-excursion' beginning around msg 68:
(URL `http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=7728#68')
[1] I use a two-head display with xrandr (and in the past with the
equivalent on w32 a three-head display) and rarely have less than two
frames open across these displays In both environments the behaviour
of `display-buffer-reuse-frames'/`display-buffer' has many weird/odd
corner cases wrt to the "strongly dedicated" and often commands do not
do what I would expect. The cummulative effect of these corner cases
is that I usually give up trying to figure out where/why/how certain
buffers/windows/frames will be displayed and just adapt to the funky.
--
/s_P\
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-01-19 21:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-01-19 16:04 display-buffer-reuse-frames default to t Stefan Monnier
2011-01-19 16:11 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-01-19 21:00 ` Stefan Monnier
2011-01-19 16:25 ` Andreas Schwab
2011-01-19 16:44 ` martin rudalics
2011-01-19 20:59 ` Stefan Monnier
2011-01-19 19:15 ` Tassilo Horn
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-01-19 18:48 MON KEY
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.