From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: list-print-separator Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 15:35:24 -0300 Message-ID: References: <8762qr8x23.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87vcy7mbxq.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87hb9nglen.fsf@lifelogs.com> <877haiebj9.fsf@lifelogs.com> <874o5mml36.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87zknel3tt.fsf@lifelogs.com> <8762q2s23e.fsf@gmail.com> <83aafe9pw2.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1303756536 28364 80.91.229.12 (25 Apr 2011 18:35:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 18:35:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, thierry.volpiatto@gmail.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 25 20:35:32 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QEQdA-0004pZ-2J for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 20:35:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52634 helo=lists2.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QEQd9-0000QB-AL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 14:35:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:51555) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QEQd6-0000Pu-IA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 14:35:29 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QEQd5-0000bd-Na for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 14:35:28 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:55534) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QEQd5-0000bZ-Kt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 14:35:27 -0400 Original-Received: from 121-249-126-200.fibertel.com.ar ([200.126.249.121]:38659 helo=ceviche.home) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QEQd5-0001Ii-6b; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 14:35:27 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 1B2C96610E; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 15:35:24 -0300 (ART) In-Reply-To: <83aafe9pw2.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 25 Apr 2011 20:55:57 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:138755 Archived-At: >> >> OK. I'll look at `pp' in my spare time :) >> > I have noticed in the past that printing a whole object with pp is >> > slower (much) than looping in this object and printing element by >> > element. >> Yes, `pp's slowness (as is usually the case for most/all software >> slowness problems) is algorithmic. > Perhaps someone could try rewriting `pp' in Python, for the latest GDB > releases. Maybe that could be faster. More generally, it would be > nice to have Python versions of the .gdbinit commands we use. ;-) Stefan