From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12078: 24.1; Improve the I-search prompt Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 05:25:42 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87txwr2ylo.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87d33esat8.fsf@mail.jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1343640423 21564 80.91.229.3 (30 Jul 2012 09:27:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 09:27:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 12078@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dani Moncayo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 30 11:26:59 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SvmFe-0005KL-En for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 11:26:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34494 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SvmFd-0008Or-DX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 05:26:57 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44251) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SvmFb-0008Om-Kt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 05:26:56 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SvmFW-0003az-25 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 05:26:55 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:40495) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SvmFV-0003as-V0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 05:26:49 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SvmMU-0001EY-8o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 05:34:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 09:34:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12078 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 12078-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12078.13436407904678 (code B ref 12078); Mon, 30 Jul 2012 09:34:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12078) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Jul 2012 09:33:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50039 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SvmLZ-0001DH-Fd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 05:33:09 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:36170) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SvmLT-0001Cm-TY for 12078@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 05:33:01 -0400 Original-Received: from fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q6U9Pi5N000412; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 05:25:45 -0400 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id DA9C3AE2CD; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 05:25:42 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Dani Moncayo's message of "Mon, 30 Jul 2012 02:45:42 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV4294=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.2.0.9309 : core <4294> : streams <792033> : uri <1178831> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:62616 Archived-At: > Regarding the "search states" (wrapped, overwrapped, ...), I see that > we disagree :). These states are currently inserted at the left side > of the search string, and I definitely would prefer to have them at > the right side, for the reason exposed in a previous post: avoid the > horizontal movement of the search string, which makes harder to > concentrate on the search string. This is an important factor, IMO. While I agree, I think always having a "[...]" to the right of the search string is even more problematic. Stefan