all messages for Emacs-related lists mirrored at yhetil.org
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: kzhr@d1.dion.ne.jp, michael.albinus@gmx.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Multibyte and unibyte file names
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 19:06:56 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <jwvzjzyt9it.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83obgel94c.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 24 Jan 2013 20:38:11 +0200")

>> > So you are saying that each primitive should detect unibyte file names
>> > it gets as arguments and DECODE_FILE them right away?
>> I think not: I was talking about decoding the file names *returned*
>> by primitives.
> What would be the difference, from the POV of the callers of the
> primitives?

That the callers get to see meaningful (decoded) names?
That file-name manipulation functions don't have the side effect of
encoding/decoding file names?

> If there is no difference, what I suggested is easier to implement,
> because it eliminates the need to test whether a given file name is
> multibyte (and needs to be encoded) or not, before handing the file
> names to system APIs.

I don't see why it eliminates this need: file-exists-p can still be
called with multibyte and unibyte strings.


        Stefan



  reply	other threads:[~2013-01-25  0:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-23 17:45 Multibyte and unibyte file names Eli Zaretskii
2013-01-23 18:08 ` Paul Eggert
2013-01-23 19:04   ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-01-23 23:38     ` Paul Eggert
2013-01-23 19:42 ` Michael Albinus
2013-01-23 20:05   ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-01-23 20:58     ` Michael Albinus
2013-01-24 16:37       ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-01-23 21:09 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-01-24 17:02   ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-01-24 18:25     ` Stefan Monnier
2013-01-24 18:38       ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-01-25  0:06         ` Stefan Monnier [this message]
2013-01-25  7:37           ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-01-25 11:36             ` Stefan Monnier
2013-01-25 20:31               ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-01-25 22:28                 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-01-26 10:54                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-01-26 11:34                     ` Stefan Monnier
2013-01-26 13:16                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-01-26 22:11                         ` Stefan Monnier
2013-01-27  7:03                           ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-01-27  8:46                             ` Andreas Schwab
2013-01-27  9:40                               ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-01-28  1:55                             ` Stefan Monnier
2013-01-28 14:44                               ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-01-28 15:21                                 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-02-02 17:19                                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-01-26 13:20                       ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2013-01-26  3:04                 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2013-01-26 11:27                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-01-26 13:03                     ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2013-01-26 13:36                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-01-26 16:26                         ` Paul Eggert
2013-01-26 18:30                           ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2013-01-26 17:10                         ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2013-01-26 17:33                           ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-01-26 18:06                             ` Paul Eggert
2013-01-26 18:20                               ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-01-26 18:56                             ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2013-01-26 21:40                               ` Stefan Monnier
2013-01-26 21:44                             ` Stefan Monnier
2013-01-27  6:14                               ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-01-26 16:05                   ` Richard Stallman
2013-01-26 17:57                     ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2013-01-26 22:16                     ` Stefan Monnier
2013-01-24 10:00 ` Michael Albinus
2013-01-24 16:40   ` Eli Zaretskii

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=jwvzjzyt9it.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org \
    --to=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=kzhr@d1.dion.ne.jp \
    --cc=michael.albinus@gmx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.