From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: (Q|V)xxx mess? Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 23:55:05 -0400 Message-ID: References: <524C3F20.6020602@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1380772524 27301 80.91.229.3 (3 Oct 2013 03:55:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 03:55:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs development discussions To: Dmitry Antipov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 03 05:55:27 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VRa0a-0007fQ-JO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Oct 2013 05:55:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39707 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VRa0a-0005Xa-7C for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2013 23:55:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52075) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VRa0Q-0005XR-Ga for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2013 23:55:21 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VRa0J-0007is-74 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2013 23:55:14 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:15501) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VRa0J-0007ik-3i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2013 23:55:07 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EABK/CFFsoXM//2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjBQsLDiYSFBgNJIgeBsEtkQoDpHqBXoMT X-IPAS-Result: Av4EABK/CFFsoXM//2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjBQsLDiYSFBgNJIgeBsEtkQoDpHqBXoMT X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,565,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="34645834" Original-Received: from 108-161-115-63.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([108.161.115.63]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 02 Oct 2013 23:51:44 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 866886644C; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 23:55:05 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <524C3F20.6020602@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Antipov's message of "Wed, 02 Oct 2013 19:43:28 +0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.182 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:163826 Archived-At: > There are few pairs of (Q|V)xxx variables where Qxxx looks like > a leftovers in favor of Vxxx counterparts. For example, (Q|V)inhibit_quit > and (Q|V)inhibit_point_motion_hooks - I don't see any real use of > Qxxx except DEFSYM and (dummy?) specbind for both. Are Qxxx really > leftovers which can be removed? Qfoo is the C counterpart of 'foo Vfoo is the C counterpart of foo IOW it should always be the case that EQ (Fsymbol_value (Qfoo), Vfoo). Stefan