From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Redisplay problems? Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 21:56:01 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87ppljg4ti.fsf@kanru-mozilla.corp.tpe1.mozilla.com> <5329C53B.3030008@gmx.at> <532ABA60.7000003@gmx.at> <83siqc7n87.fsf@gnu.org> <83a9ck6lzf.fsf@gnu.org> <83eh1v5y53.fsf@gnu.org> <83y5024r1w.fsf@gnu.org> <83ior6489a.fsf@gnu.org> <834n2q43os.fsf@gnu.org> <83siqa2gir.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1395626186 24400 80.91.229.3 (24 Mar 2014 01:56:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 01:56:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, christian@defun.dk, cloos@jhcloos.com, kanru@kanru.info, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 24 02:56:34 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WRu7t-0000op-Ul for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 02:56:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34124 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRu7t-0004IT-LR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 21:56:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46486) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRu7k-0004IK-Rs for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 21:56:32 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRu7c-0002PU-9T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 21:56:24 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:58890) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRu7c-0002PQ-4N; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 21:56:16 -0400 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id s2O1uJai030285; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 21:56:19 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 14CBF6017C; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 21:56:01 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <83siqa2gir.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 22 Mar 2014 21:13:32 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV4890=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9362 : core <4890> : inlines <634> : streams <1143618> : uri <1708059> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:170894 Archived-At: >> If the garbaged flag is set, the behavior is not much better: instead of >> exposing outdated content we don't expose anything (i.e. it stays >> blank), and again the next redisplay should fix. > Actually, that's not true: the frame doesn't stay blank. When the > garbaged flag is set, expose_frame doesn't do anything: "doesn't do anything" to me means that the screen will be blank. Or show whatever was displayed there before. In either case it's not the correct content. Stefan