From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Rant - Emacs mail is not user friendly Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2014 10:53:23 -0500 Message-ID: References: <871tp4wut1.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87mw7qvign.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87bno5ulbu.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1416671652 18858 80.91.229.3 (22 Nov 2014 15:54:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2014 15:54:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: stephen@xemacs.org, kelly@prtime.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Richard Stallman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 22 16:54:05 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XsD0b-0006mx-RR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 16:54:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45837 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XsD0b-0001n9-Cp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 10:54:01 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44781) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XsD0G-0001mq-UG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 10:53:48 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XsD09-0003EU-G7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 10:53:40 -0500 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:37329) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XsD01-0003EA-JN; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 10:53:25 -0500 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id sAMFrNTY005062; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 10:53:23 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 3A6FD43AC; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 10:53:23 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Sat, 22 Nov 2014 06:08:11 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV5133=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9393 : core <5133> : inlines <1554> : streams <1346821> : uri <1835705> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:178017 Archived-At: >> That's nice, but some security bugs strike even when faced with >> a correct/valid JPG file. > Is this known to happen now, or is it a speculation, or what? I don't keep track of specific security bugs nowadays, but just based on the size of the code, the fact that it's written in C and it's history, I don't think I'd take much risk to say that there is such a bug right now. Stefan