From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 2b2fd39: xterm.el: Implement OSC-52 functionality for setting the X selection Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2015 23:12:47 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20150413144903.4697.38336@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <2yvbguvize.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1429413189 10309 80.91.229.3 (19 Apr 2015 03:13:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 03:13:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 19 05:12:59 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YjffG-00057w-4n for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 05:12:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47393 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YjffF-0007Uq-7K for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 23:12:57 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60276) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YjffB-0007Ug-S0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 23:12:54 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YjffB-0002Ps-1L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 23:12:53 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:39327) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yjff6-0002Od-SK; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 23:12:48 -0400 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id t3J3ClKw021058; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 23:12:47 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 7B9E12488; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 23:12:47 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Sat, 18 Apr 2015 17:16:40 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV5280=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9393 : core <5280> : inlines <2752> : streams <1424841> : uri <1910279> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:185650 Archived-At: >> AFAIK this was all written by Google employees and is covered by >> Google's blanket assignment. > Ah right, I missed that. You're not alone: I forgot about it twice along the way. And it took me a little while after your question to remember what was the answer. >> We don't have a good way to track/check it, tho. > Indeed. I think I'm liable to forget this the next time it comes up. For me, it's not just "liable to". I know for a fact that I will have forgotten (probably by next week or so). > A @gmail address doesn't make me think "employed by Google". Indeed, that person should also have (and should use) a @google.com address. Maybe recording the @google.com address would be a good first step to try and keep track of this. > (I'm always somewhat surprised that we apparently don't need individuals > whose employer owns their stuff to sign something anyway.) Same here. Stetfan