From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2016 10:47:36 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20161223215056.GA2771@acm.fritz.box> <864m1t11wo.fsf@stephe-leake.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1482681343 8115 195.159.176.226 (25 Dec 2016 15:55:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2016 15:55:43 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 25 16:55:39 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cLB8s-00083i-OH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 25 Dec 2016 16:55:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47243 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cLB8x-0001qf-DX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 25 Dec 2016 10:55:27 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56971) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cLB8r-0001qV-Gm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Dec 2016 10:55:22 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cLB8o-00029O-GH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Dec 2016 10:55:21 -0500 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=42080 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cLB8o-00029G-A4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Dec 2016 10:55:18 -0500 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cLB8c-0006BM-70 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Dec 2016 16:55:06 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 8 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:KjCB6xWp0rpJKOYVM1R6QE5F1E0= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:210805 Archived-At: >> How come comment-cache is slower on the second run than on the first? > Building the interval tree that stores text properties from scratch is > faster than modifying it. Indeed, that could explain it, thanks, Stefan