From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: User-defined record types, v2 Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 11:07:20 -0400 Message-ID: References: <86y3w2tt2n.fsf@molnjunk.nocrew.org> <86pohbosxp.fsf@molnjunk.nocrew.org> <86r31omqkp.fsf@molnjunk.nocrew.org> <86d1d8mq6d.fsf@molnjunk.nocrew.org> <86vaqzkmk5.fsf@molnjunk.nocrew.org> <86lgrogsit.fsf@molnjunk.nocrew.org> <86zig2g6cv.fsf@molnjunk.nocrew.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1490886555 8083 195.159.176.226 (30 Mar 2017 15:09:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 15:09:15 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 30 17:09:08 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ctbhE-0001L9-L1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 17:09:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36230 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ctbhI-0005mV-4w for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 11:09:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40980) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ctbg0-0004zT-BP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 11:07:53 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ctbfv-0001R2-Cu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 11:07:52 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=36468 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ctbfv-0001Q2-5r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 11:07:47 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ctbfm-0001v0-Bq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 17:07:38 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 17 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:qfQvqOS7AeDqx6+K2ZTqbCSfn0A= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:213527 Archived-At: >>> I'm trying to make progress on this. If we bump the version of the >>> generated elc files from 23 to 24, we can check for that. >> I think it's OK to ask the user to explicitly enable the compatibility >> code. It's also a way to make the user aware of the issue and >> motivate him to recompile his files. > Ok, I'll drop that commit then. But I suppose the check in > cl-struct-define can stay? I think so, yes. > Once that is fixed, I believe the branch is ready for merging. As far > as I know. Should I wait for a "go" or "no go" decision from someone? Yes: I don't know if Eli and John think this is a good idea. Stefan