From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Should wide-int be registered in features? Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2018 18:21:54 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1522966851 26796 195.159.176.226 (5 Apr 2018 22:20:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2018 22:20:51 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 06 00:20:46 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f4DFO-0006tM-KE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Apr 2018 00:20:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58996 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f4DHU-0007Rs-3Z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2018 18:22:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42825) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f4DGi-0007RX-NT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2018 18:22:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f4DGe-0003Jn-PN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2018 18:22:08 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=36558 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f4DGe-0003JI-HQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2018 18:22:04 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f4DEV-0005r7-BX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Apr 2018 00:19:51 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 9 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:E32/PnFIO+ygXAV7b3ZHeR0BnK0= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:224380 Archived-At: > But there are a couple additional features that might be helpful, both in > such a bytecode lint program and independent of that: whether emacs was > built with --with-wide-int. I don't see why that would be relevant: --with-wide-int should give pretty much the same result as building on a 64bit system. Stefan