From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: :alnum: broken? Date: Sat, 29 Feb 2020 09:14:21 -0500 Message-ID: References: <86wo8flqct.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <03A37C4B-9FE8-4A25-9851-79BC8265455E@acm.org> <142e845d-eba3-5975-fa63-4c1b14ed4600@cs.ucla.edu> <3A14F30E-60EF-4C99-AC1A-9A1B2539169B@acm.org> <837e07gmka.fsf@gnu.org> <1c654ac9-10a2-4e5d-f77c-3b78bb580ffc@cs.ucla.edu> <83v9nqg8la.fsf@gnu.org> <298a093f-6eed-3a9f-99cf-bd17b9cb61f0@cs.ucla.edu> <83blpifp95.fsf@gnu.org> <81bfdae0-9fe1-f173-adb1-b5fe2ba2b808@cs.ucla.edu> <834kvafnwk.fsf@gnu.org> <8DA6D8F4-921B-4FB8-A7A3-CE75B10CE668@acm.org> <83zhd2e6h6.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="4860"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , eggert@cs.ucla.edu, cpitclaudel@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Mattias =?windows-1252?Q?Engdeg=E5rd?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 29 15:14:58 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1j82tO-00019v-IS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 15:14:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60918 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j82tN-0002gz-J8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 09:14:57 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40998) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j82su-0002FT-5H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 09:14:29 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j82st-0000zo-5T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 09:14:27 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:17960) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j82sr-0000yt-TJ; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 09:14:25 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D63CC814E0; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 09:14:24 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 01A0B8109E; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 09:14:23 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1582985663; bh=nAzG+YyuHAQKVMzfL6u0o0DL7qBr0iGNwrMfDE3vC+E=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=XGDOKzZcb1C4Dfd3PV7earMmi3+L+lJWvf+VKd/CPDdPet4ZApNRzRpLzjAkkcr1N xYyd69ZS7q7u2QKpwOpubuvIhIvnvxD6KM2Q7tMDpBP8tTXijFl5BvoFjGispxAicL OHO5QkYSGzsSTV9zB6cIpZps9OIyq0q0S5aeV4758grX0oJa3dZdf0VDh0IjKQCZw6 QZUwZbW4SXZTV7oa/ZXgfv7b9ffJGGCu2cZ7pxIYSynnf9YxxOveUr0uvR4tp40al2 MB7jZtrCzy012TSFEbDV+Svtfb6+/pA7lJZWjWiXUHfgAznvKH2deENQ5hnIFvGgxp IOfqkeK70ev+Q== Original-Received: from pastel (unknown [216.154.50.221]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 630A31200E8; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 09:14:22 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: ("Mattias =?windows-1252?Q?Engdeg=E5rd=22's?= message of "Sat, 29 Feb 2020 12:43:38 +0100") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 132.204.25.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:245123 Archived-At: > In Emacs's own compiler, all warnings are on by default: [...] > We all agree that this is as it should be, because although experienced > users would know how to enable the warnings, it is those who don't that need > them the most. Actually, from where I stand the warnings have two purposes: 1- Communicate with our users. 2- Help catch errors. And from that point of view, the first is the main reason why they're enabled by default. Stefan