From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Merging native-comp and pgtk Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2021 23:32:29 -0500 Message-ID: References: <07D5E64D-DAD0-45B3-B272-627A73D7CBAE@gmail.com> <83sg69o3av.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtwhctte.fsf@gnus.org> <459A0475-E3E7-4159-82DF-93809CCF1E24@gmail.com> <87eehng52n.fsf@gnus.org> <87mtwbye5b.fsf@gmail.com> <87czx7ycva.fsf@tcd.ie> <87eehmyalr.fsf@gmail.com> <877dneoewi.fsf@tcd.ie> <875z2yy6z7.fsf@gmail.com> <878s7twq2t.fsf@gmail.com> <84adc238-c424-bb6b-da28-c4232172da5b@gmx.at> <87wnvcrze8.fsf@gnus.org> <83eehkcapb.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="35826"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, akrl@sdf.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 14 05:33:46 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lB96P-0009Cd-O5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 14 Feb 2021 05:33:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51982 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lB96O-00017U-P6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 23:33:44 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45866) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lB95G-0000WU-Hf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 23:32:34 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:37130) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lB95F-0007T6-2H; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 23:32:34 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B4739441227; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 23:32:31 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8938C441228; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 23:32:30 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1613277150; bh=9t0A5GwgpBQ/FBZAioNWLqG2ERUHvn82PWCHtSEXRt0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=lFDq09aHLTU4Ctv4DzQJpN4rHZCsiBRJ8UNAR+f5/6yp2WgW5qSsK8vc3g5Ej6FSL NQVBfoyuIhTWZbMFTWM3icKaF1UWkHHfsQTsxsqkYsP8tXZsgS3/6NA1jcwiEzIAIa akTBfhKSGqZTrXiu29Q598QTWV2Nk6EW8UaT2Ltdoksah3Ge79JYXqOFvHzPQIT1Vs EWlxkeRas4kicvWLB4OuV3Wn5ZZVzSURJD4ohalQWijrHBXRKUOMOOQPwmJ0JVUWxo brNVLaJGmdqDb072HkwcvVjDTEjPfgoNCgv+LT2jAm6SakgKjvFd0yHSzWmm7XMqvn tQAYqmH78lHvQ== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [216.154.41.47]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 498C31200A1; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 23:32:30 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <83eehkcapb.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 13 Feb 2021 16:18:56 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:264680 Archived-At: > The question was whether it should be ON by default. If the problem > with that happens on slow machines, we should consider an > alternative: have it OFF by default and ask users of slow machines to > turn this ON. I don't think we'll be able to make such decisions before the code is on `master` and we have feedback from a lot more people (and not just those interested in the feature). Stefan