From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [elpa] main 8f4cb59: * elpa-packages (counsel, ivy, swiper): Auto-sync. Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 17:47:09 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20210225102521.11653.64611@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20210225102523.7CEF420B28@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <87h7m0z07r.fsf@tcd.ie> <87mtvsundg.fsf@tcd.ie> <875z20m0oa.fsf@tcd.ie> <87eegn18rr.fsf@tcd.ie> <87im5x8vil.fsf@tcd.ie> <87eegl7are.fsf@tcd.ie> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27941"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: "Basil L. Contovounesios" , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Oleh Krehel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 11 23:48:18 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lKU6M-0007Bh-RN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 23:48:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53294 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKU6L-0003eQ-Te for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 17:48:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43740) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKU5L-0002nl-MI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 17:47:15 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:23348) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKU5J-0001ku-Vm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 17:47:15 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 3FD6580B6D; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 17:47:13 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B6878801E9; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 17:47:11 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1615502831; bh=O3YDkSnf8AYfyYFbyHc5L/axwICILGk6oBzCiJ0URN0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=J/K8sWDesp/p4d8x63WqEOV+uzPMLZTrsgFY1HleouO5HcVjty+wqMfjPxOGc5ZEO 8qjkxIEFAjRGdZmTI9ADgMjPEaID8rJGRNh1lsIVV8MuIJno/nyNPeQEZI8pLGsa6Q xR4Y6EG6MxfwF8p41Lil8PchDkgoa8k/6HXoyZFFvZZFBkRuidiHhVKjFN6Da5XKVW hhOgflzge1/TmnZIW+fiKxShLNlSUcqdlOiNNxtZjY49ayMtWzdNvGLPPLhyZZNl+s jq08QiCzo2uBDtRIwdwUQGRt+IGaXCjA4pgVi1/9g2tkVuGFoV7FDfHhamBEX+3d20 8x4hAta/bkuNQ== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [216.154.43.249]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8035912021E; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 17:47:11 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87eegl7are.fsf@tcd.ie> (Basil L. Contovounesios's message of "Thu, 11 Mar 2021 19:25:57 +0000") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:266371 Archived-At: Basil L. Contovounesios [2021-03-11 19:25:57] wrote: > Stefan Monnier writes: >> For `ivy-avy` I think the argument is almost the same, except I don't >> see any reason why it isn't done yet (there doesn't seem to be any need >> for `avy` to be around to compile correctly `ivy-avy`). >> >> So, let's start with this: Could we merge `ivy-avy` into `ivy`? > That's where it was until last year: > > https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/elpa.git/commit/?id=6a576cba564ab8860142f9ec343b13ec89cc2440 Hmm... that commit's just moves the code to a separate file, but that's not the same as separating it into its own subpackage. Oleh, what was the motivation for splitting ivy-avy.el into its own (sub)package instead of bundling it with the `ivy` package? Stefan