From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs' C: static inline considered useless nowadays? Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 09:32:32 -0400 Message-ID: References: <874jw37764.fsf@rfc20.org> <835ygj3rqp.fsf@gnu.org> <877d0y6zex.fsf@rfc20.org> <83ilki1cyo.fsf@gnu.org> <874jw26vht.fsf@rfc20.org> <83h701278i.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="14680"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Matt Armstrong , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 18 15:49:30 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1okmyI-0003bz-Lv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 15:49:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55008 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1okmyF-0001Rl-QE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 09:49:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33116) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1okmiS-0004RW-VW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 09:33:13 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:19271) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1okmi1-0005Gz-Ik; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 09:32:51 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9D95F80976; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 09:32:35 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id EAE3080796; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 09:32:33 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1666099954; bh=mhWVYRyYFnGPO7qza+F0KuUyQSlJdobyF+0a0aoGaUk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=bd7t98FNyw8vepHRy2x62qLxl7s9ktl0DNgLHTCbzMtAsw4w/WPHNJugLcGmEiauW TNHLVdIsEuP62XUYlf7xTkIFtxkRhKVmDqibzpfW5IE91qjGEP+odQoRJ5TdHjCJxI VAVJuc7BtIq+iNZP93sf3AmOJjbb9VYdb7a2RPh9pryoz8HFghvsDTk0t6nZ8fu5E5 pbjG6WH3eGZmSCdoH1eEPgPZx10sVMvEEVoYEj3EAQ+gdu7KluFKC3WLXiGQfozvdr mTtzFx0wGqPalOhBiildP6U/vuXPMMbI4ivBXlB3hMWT8yEo6g5L7+U95xU8ta/32P LzYukyBTKnEdw== Original-Received: from pastel (65-110-220-202.cpe.pppoe.ca [65.110.220.202]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 75295120866; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 09:32:33 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <83h701278i.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 18 Oct 2022 05:30:53 +0300") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:298042 Archived-At: > Never mind that; it's a historic accident. Just use 'static' and let > the compiler decide when to inline. Since both `gcc` and `clang` obey the `inline` attribute in that case for options like `-Og`, it can still be a good idea to keep them in those places where we think it makes a significant difference. Stefan