From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: status of dir-vars or dir-locals inclusion in emacs? Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 10:06:30 -0400 Message-ID: References: <200709042153.l84LrdvU008320@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1189001216 29485 80.91.229.12 (5 Sep 2007 14:06:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 14:06:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: tromey@redhat.com, Dan Nicolaescu , joakim@verona.se, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 05 16:06:55 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ISvWs-0006sc-2Q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2007 16:06:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ISvWq-00009x-CD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2007 10:06:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ISvWm-00009D-Hk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2007 10:06:44 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ISvWj-00007x-Vz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2007 10:06:44 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ISvWj-00007l-J5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2007 10:06:41 -0400 Original-Received: from tomts5-srv.bellnexxia.net ([209.226.175.25]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ISvWc-00023l-B6; Wed, 05 Sep 2007 10:06:34 -0400 Original-Received: from pastel.home ([70.53.192.250]) by tomts5-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.13 201-253-122-130-113-20050324) with ESMTP id <20070905140631.PNNF1592.tomts5-srv.bellnexxia.net@pastel.home>; Wed, 5 Sep 2007 10:06:31 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id BC69382E5; Wed, 5 Sep 2007 10:06:30 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Wed\, 05 Sep 2007 02\:16\:40 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Detected-Kernel: Solaris 8 (1) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:77859 Archived-At: > Can we please reduce the number of the files that are looked up from > 3 to 2? Do we need both .emacs-settings.el and .emacs-settings? IMHO > one of them should be enough. > If the time to search for these files is an issue, we could look for > just one file, .emacs-settings.el. Is it really an issue? I don't think it's an issue but I don't see any reason to search for more than one file for now. We'll probably (based on past history for other config files) want/need to add more file names in the future for various reasons, but for now I don't see any. Stefan