From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: "simplifications" Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 10:27:13 -0500 Message-ID: References: <86ejem1pig.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1195572462 25833 80.91.229.12 (20 Nov 2007 15:27:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 15:27:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 20 16:27:48 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IuV0o-0002uU-7P for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 16:27:42 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IuV0Z-00030b-Nu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 10:27:27 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IuV0W-000301-Vt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 10:27:25 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IuV0V-0002zU-HD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 10:27:24 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IuV0V-0002zR-9E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 10:27:23 -0500 Original-Received: from mercure.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.24.67]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IuV0R-0003tZ-De; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 10:27:19 -0500 Original-Received: from hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.50]) by mercure.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92BC42CF75D; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 10:27:18 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (faina.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.26.177]) by hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 718453FE0; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 10:27:13 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 508656CAB3; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 10:27:13 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Mon, 19 Nov 2007 22:59:14 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-DIRO-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-DIRO-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-DIRO-MailScanner-SpamCheck: n'est pas un polluriel, SpamAssassin (score=-2.82, requis 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -2.82) X-DIRO-MailScanner-From: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:83717 Archived-At: > Well, my optimization is not specific to defsubst, so it will also > remove the let-binding in: > (let ((debug-on-error t)) > (car (car (cdr x)))) > Which optimization is that one? Some optimization with which I played locally. I still have it in my tree, but all I got from it is an understanding that it's not the right way to approach the problem :-) Stefan