From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: python.el fixes for Emacs 22 Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 09:45:37 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87ve4sqsqe.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <18356.54892.186541.669277@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1203173161 11399 80.91.229.12 (16 Feb 2008 14:46:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 14:46:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Leo Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 16 15:46:24 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JQOJ0-00073i-Pj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2008 15:46:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JQOIW-0002jX-BS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2008 09:45:48 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JQOIS-0002ix-2J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2008 09:45:44 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JQOIQ-0002ib-E8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2008 09:45:43 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JQOIQ-0002iY-8O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2008 09:45:42 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.pppoe.ca ([206.248.154.182]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JQOIM-000732-J2; Sat, 16 Feb 2008 09:45:38 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ao8CAH+FtkdMCpRc/2dsb2JhbACsbYEC X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,361,1199682000"; d="scan'208";a="14598313" Original-Received: from smtp.pppoe.ca ([65.39.196.238]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP; 16 Feb 2008 09:45:37 -0500 Original-Received: from pastel.home ([76.10.148.92]) by smtp.pppoe.ca (Internet Mail Server v1.0) with ESMTP id WQJ62137; Sat, 16 Feb 2008 09:45:37 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 066E67FCA; Sat, 16 Feb 2008 09:45:37 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Leo's message of "Sat, 16 Feb 2008 08:18:59 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:89250 Archived-At: >> This is true. It is probably not worth the trouble, particularly >> there are tons of python editors that are far superior than Emacs. >> To name one, SciTE. >> >> What is superior about it? [ List of features superior to what `ed' provides. ] The context wanted to say "what is superior *to Emacs* about SciTE". Stefan