From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: NeXTStep port: slowness, etc. Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 12:04:38 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1216224449 18366 80.91.229.12 (16 Jul 2008 16:07:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 16:07:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Adrian Robert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 16 18:08:17 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KJ9Xi-0002XA-4W for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 18:07:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36884 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KJ9Wp-0007Lz-HL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 12:06:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KJ9Vj-0006eo-O0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 12:05:47 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KJ9Vg-0006dQ-64 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 12:05:45 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40446 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KJ9Vf-0006dK-VX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 12:05:44 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:37008) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KJ9Vf-0000F1-JF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 12:05:43 -0400 Original-Received: from ceviche.home (vpn-132-204-232-63.acd.umontreal.ca [132.204.232.63]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m6GG5d2E007637 for ; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 12:05:39 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id B97E4B4097; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 12:04:38 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Adrian Robert's message of "Wed, 16 Jul 2008 12:29:20 +0000 (UTC)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 3 Rules triggered HAS_X_HELO=0, RV3061=0, XH_GE5=0 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:100815 Archived-At: > This is the right thing to do, but it means some significant work > may be needed to recover normal performance. When I looked into I don't think so. E.g. If you replace Qsuper with Qt in the call to where_is_internal, you should get back the normal speed. Stefan