From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Change in rmail-reply Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:18:12 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20090127064421.GZ4175@volo.donarmstrong.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1233080618 21236 80.91.229.12 (27 Jan 2009 18:23:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 18:23:38 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 27 19:24:52 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LRscG-0006vY-0K for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 19:24:52 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38242 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LRsax-0004Qw-Ca for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:23:31 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LRsVu-00085z-Ne for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:18:18 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LRsVs-00082S-0B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:18:17 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=54991 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LRsVr-000826-Lp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:18:15 -0500 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:45383) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LRsVr-00066y-5G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:18:15 -0500 Original-Received: from alfajor.home (vpn-132-204-232-105.acd.umontreal.ca [132.204.232.105]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id n0RIIDVJ020699; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:18:13 -0500 Original-Received: by alfajor.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 176731C14C; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:18:12 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20090127064421.GZ4175@volo.donarmstrong.com> (Don Armstrong's message of "Mon, 26 Jan 2009 22:44:21 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV3198=0 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:108303 Archived-At: > Resent-To: fields are only there to indicate when a message has been > reinserted into the mail delivery chain by someone. Yes. And in many cases, those fields aren't even added. They're about as useful as the "Received:" headers. Stefan