From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: end-of-defun is fubsr. Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 14:26:57 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20090204154427.GD1049@muc.de> <20090213110819.GA2975@muc.de> <20090213164210.GC2975@muc.de> <20090213185756.GD2975@muc.de> <20090214180030.GA4679@muc.de> <20090214232535.GA3623@muc.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1234726040 32281 80.91.229.12 (15 Feb 2009 19:27:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 19:27:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Chong Yidong , Miles Bader , =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=F6hler?= , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 15 20:28:34 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LYmfK-000473-Dg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 20:28:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57906 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LYme0-0001pP-2n for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 14:27:12 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LYmdt-0001mS-Iw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 14:27:05 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LYmdq-0001gz-7S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 14:27:05 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40325 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LYmdp-0001gr-TE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 14:27:01 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.pppoe.ca ([206.248.154.182]:38880 helo=ironport2-out.teksavvy.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LYmdo-0001h9-LV; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 14:27:00 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ao4FAKD6l0lMCpTK/2dsb2JhbACBbs4HhBwGgzI X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.38,212,1233550800"; d="scan'208";a="33913838" Original-Received: from 76-10-148-202.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([76.10.148.202]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP; 15 Feb 2009 14:26:58 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id EBB9984C5; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 14:26:57 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20090214232535.GA3623@muc.de> (Alan Mackenzie's message of "Sat, 14 Feb 2009 23:25:35 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.90 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:109087 Archived-At: >> I prefer the current text. > Was my patch really that bad? I'm not saying it's bad, I'm saying that I find it less good than the current text. Most of the differences are nitpicks on which we disagree for reasons explained over and over in this thread. > Look, I'm as sick of all this as you must be. AFAIK the only thing still missing is the addition of ARG to EOD-function, which is something I prefer to postpone because it's not a bug fix and we're in pretest. Stefan