From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ja-dic.el and SKK-JYSYO.L Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:34:46 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1266435305 15413 80.91.229.12 (17 Feb 2010 19:35:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 19:35:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, expire-by-2010-02-18@kanis.fr, handa@m17n.org To: ams@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 17 20:35:01 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nhpfn-0003LL-2V for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 20:34:59 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57484 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nhpfm-00007K-FR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:34:58 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Nhpfg-00006S-5O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:34:52 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=39694 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nhpff-000067-GA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:34:51 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nhpfe-0004jZ-WF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:34:51 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:64113 helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nhpfb-0004iw-Nv; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:34:47 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAO/Te0vO+LpH/2dsb2JhbACbAXW9boRdBIMVh10 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,493,1262581200"; d="scan'208";a="56216871" Original-Received: from 206-248-186-71.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([206.248.186.71]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP; 17 Feb 2010 14:34:46 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 6D1D18050; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:34:46 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Alfred M. Szmidt's message of "Wed, 17 Feb 2010 02:31:49 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.92 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:121169 Archived-At: > Stefan "As mentioned, I'd even prefer to just keep all > those files in the tarball" > Is there some problem of not doing exactly that? Not that I know. If we need to save bandwidth, getting rid of the .elc files would be at least as effective. Stefan