From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Pushing the `gnus-range-*' functions down into the C layer Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 11:48:07 +0200 Message-ID: References: <8739ti68sz.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87pqwm1dsl.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87iq2d4sd5.fsf@lifelogs.com> <8762yd4r7j.fsf@lifelogs.com> <8762ydr5br.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1284199438 4526 80.91.229.12 (11 Sep 2010 10:03:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 10:03:58 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 11 12:03:56 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OuMw8-000210-Mf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 12:03:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56227 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OuMiQ-0000gt-TX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 05:49:47 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=33377 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OuMiG-0000ca-Hr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 05:49:39 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OuMgt-00066Z-Sk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 05:48:15 -0400 Original-Received: from impaqm5.telefonica.net ([213.4.138.5]:44120) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OuMgt-00066R-JU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 05:48:11 -0400 Original-Received: from IMPmailhost5.adm.correo ([10.20.102.126]) by IMPaqm5.telefonica.net with bizsmtp id 5M0e1f01n2jdgqJ3RMo9zU; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 11:48:09 +0200 Original-Received: from ceviche.home ([83.61.39.212]) by IMPmailhost5.adm.correo with BIZ IMP id 5Mo71f0024aeRwb1lMo7oA; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 11:48:09 +0200 X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-TE-authinfo: authemail="monnier$movistar.es" |auth_email="monnier@movistar.es" X-TE-AcuTerraCos: auth_cuTerraCos="cosuitnetc01" Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 3683F660D2; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 11:48:07 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Fri, 10 Sep 2010 17:26:59 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:129963 Archived-At: > Well, that's the case in Common Lisp, but it needn't be in Emacs Lisp. > `eq' could just use `=' as the comparison function for bignums. Even > though that would be a non-traditional way of doing it. You're basically suggesting to replace `eq' with `eql', which has non-trivial performance implications. Stefan