From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7083: Why is `copy-tree's symbol-plist carrying side-effect-free error-free? Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 00:19:47 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1285281679 24623 80.91.229.12 (23 Sep 2010 22:41:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 22:41:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 7083@debbugs.gnu.org, Andreas Schwab To: MON KEY Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 24 00:41:17 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OyuTY-0004Dv-En for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 00:41:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33871 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OyuTY-0007LG-0W for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 18:41:12 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=47881 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OyuTR-0007KU-EZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 18:41:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OyuTQ-0006Oq-0F for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 18:41:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:38936) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OyuTP-0006Om-Tt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 18:41:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oyu78-0007DK-1X; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 18:18:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 22:18:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7083 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7083-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7083.128528023227723 (code B ref 7083); Thu, 23 Sep 2010 22:18:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7083) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Sep 2010 22:17:12 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oyu6K-0007D6-F7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 18:17:12 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oyu6J-0007Cz-22 for 7083@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 18:17:11 -0400 Original-Received: from dyn.144-85-172-119.dsl.vtx.ch ([144.85.172.119]:12067 helo=fmsmemgm.homelinux.net) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oyu8q-000077-De; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 18:19:48 -0400 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 7F1666611D; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 00:19:47 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: (MON KEY's message of "Thu, 23 Sep 2010 01:23:44 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 18:18:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:40386 Archived-At: > Why has this bug been marked done? > When copy-tree copies vectors they share structure. C-h f copy-tree RET documents the second (optional) argument which affects this behavior. So it looks perfectly correct, and documented. Stefan