From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Dynamic rescaling in doc-view.el Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 22:52:32 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87zkrfm47j.fsf@member.fsf.org> <83ei8rm3tr.fsf@gnu.org> <87vd23m373.fsf@member.fsf.org> <83bp3un0rb.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1294373359 15485 80.91.229.12 (7 Jan 2011 04:09:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 04:09:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Tassilo Horn , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 07 05:09:15 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pb3da-0005NM-TF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Jan 2011 05:09:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33596 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pb3Op-0003kA-Ph for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 22:53:59 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=45688 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pb3NV-0003Q8-9r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 22:52:39 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pb3NT-0006iR-Dp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 22:52:37 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:2679 helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pb3NR-0006hc-It; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 22:52:33 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAHMcJk1MCpdc/2dsb2JhbACkHnS9C4VMBIRnjiA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,286,1291611600"; d="scan'208";a="87277965" Original-Received: from 76-10-151-92.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([76.10.151.92]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 06 Jan 2011 22:52:32 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id A4D7558B92; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 22:52:32 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <83bp3un0rb.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 06 Jan 2011 05:56:24 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:134339 Archived-At: > That's expected, since bzr commits locally before pushing upstream. IIUC it doesn't: it only performs the local commit after the upstream one is finished. That's one of the reasons why a bound branch's commit is not quite the same as "bzr commit; bzr push" in an unbound branch. Stefan