From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Redirecting standard output Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 19:54:40 -0300 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1303340091 14037 80.91.229.12 (20 Apr 2011 22:54:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 22:54:51 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 21 00:54:47 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QCgIJ-0006J5-Iq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 00:54:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44807 helo=lists2.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QCgIJ-0005Fu-6B for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 18:54:47 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:49750) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QCgIG-0005Fd-IX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 18:54:45 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QCgIF-0001y1-Qh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 18:54:44 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:38357) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QCgIF-0001xx-PD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 18:54:43 -0400 Original-Received: from 213-159-126-200.fibertel.com.ar ([200.126.159.213]:42886 helo=ceviche.home) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QCgIF-0006Pl-9V; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 18:54:43 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id A511766740; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 19:54:40 -0300 (ART) In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Wed, 20 Apr 2011 23:19:57 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:138595 Archived-At: > I'm not sure what the syntax would be, though, since a string parameter > to REAL-BUFFER already means "use the buffer with this name".... > eurmh... well, off the top of my head, we could use keywords for the > complex case. That is BUFFER could be, er, something like > (:stdout (:file "/tmp/foo") :stderr (:buffer "bar")) > Backwards compatibility would be easy to maintain. Sounds fine to me, as long as the patch is simple enough, Stefan