From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Elisp native profiler Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 22:13:31 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83zk4egs0w.fsf@gnu.org> <83y5jygrni.fsf@gnu.org> <50620443.8050301@cs.ucla.edu> <20120926151625.229ef3cc9caf90e5098b18ef@cx4a.org> <83ipb1grs9.fsf@gnu.org> <20120926165946.87a9f8c58aad890dafb50494@cx4a.org> <83d319gmd6.fsf@gnu.org> <20120927074655.a943e298fc9319a438825f47@cx4a.org> <83wqzgf1qs.fsf@gnu.org> <20120928190956.3ec9efaa97178d2e16ad6179@cx4a.org> <833922h0g1.fsf@gnu.org> <83vceyfd1m.fsf@gnu.org> <83obkpgb0x.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1348884823 1551 80.91.229.3 (29 Sep 2012 02:13:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 02:13:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: tomo@cx4a.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 29 04:13:48 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1THmYp-0001Tz-9R for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 04:13:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56615 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1THmYj-0002Tg-P1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 22:13:37 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:39416) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1THmYh-0002T3-FC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 22:13:36 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1THmYg-0003UQ-N2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 22:13:35 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:37933) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1THmYf-0003TM-Eq; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 22:13:33 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAG6Zu09FxLT4/2dsb2JhbABEtBGBCIIVAQEEAVYjBQsLNBIUGA0kiBwFugmQRAOjM4FYgwU X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,637,1330923600"; d="scan'208";a="200256635" Original-Received: from 69-196-180-248.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.196.180.248]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 28 Sep 2012 22:13:32 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id C8B1C59468; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 22:13:31 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <83obkpgb0x.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 28 Sep 2012 22:14:38 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.182 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:153697 Archived-At: > OK, let me rephrase: why not add such a test to any primitive which is > large enough to make an addition of a test negligible for its run time? That'd be fine, yes. Stefan