From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#14448: Wrong indentation in comment lines for F90 mode? Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 14:36:47 -0400 Message-ID: References: <519DF4B7.4020304@alice.it> <519E754D.1030405@alice.it> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1369593497 809 80.91.229.3 (26 May 2013 18:38:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 18:38:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 14448@debbugs.gnu.org, Angelo Graziosi To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun May 26 20:38:15 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ugfpf-0006mw-94 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 26 May 2013 20:38:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41676 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ugfpe-0007nM-TE for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 26 May 2013 14:38:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49206) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UgfpT-0007b9-0c for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 26 May 2013 14:38:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UgfpN-0001eG-IR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 26 May 2013 14:38:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:47348) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UgfpN-0001eC-Fz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 26 May 2013 14:37:57 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UgfqT-0007Fy-02 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 26 May 2013 14:39:05 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 18:39:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 14448 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: help Original-Received: via spool by 14448-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B14448.136959348827675 (code B ref 14448); Sun, 26 May 2013 18:39:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 14448) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 May 2013 18:38:08 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35705 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UgfpW-0007CI-Gj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 26 May 2013 14:38:06 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:52244) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UgfpU-0007Bb-M8 for 14448@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 26 May 2013 14:38:05 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EABK/CFFFpZ3p/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjBQsLDiYSFBgNJIgeBsEtkQoDpHqBXoMT X-IPAS-Result: Av4EABK/CFFFpZ3p/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjBQsLDiYSFBgNJIgeBsEtkQoDpHqBXoMT X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,565,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="14511698" Original-Received: from 69-165-157-233.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.165.157.233]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 26 May 2013 14:36:43 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 59BA363127; Sun, 26 May 2013 14:36:47 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Sat, 25 May 2013 23:09:03 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:74582 Archived-At: > Is M-j supposed to re-indent the line it starts on, or not? That's unspecified. IIUC it doesn't, currently. > If not, is it supposed to indent the following line as it would normally > be indented, or to match the indentation of the original line? The new line should be indented according to indent-according-to-mode. > If the answers are "no", and "as normal", then there is no bug here. At least w.r.t M-j, that's my impression as well: the only problem is that the OP wants his ! comments to be on column 0 whereas f90-mode puts them in column 1, but that's unrelated to M-j. Stefan