From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15746: 24.3; [PATCH] bookmark should confirm when overwrite Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:17:20 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87iowg9bqw.fsf@floss.red-bean.com> <089d6db9-1a1c-4f33-a999-7fd063e7e772@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1383157100 13303 80.91.229.3 (30 Oct 2013 18:18:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 18:18:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Karl Fogel , 15746@debbugs.gnu.org, Leo Liu To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 30 19:18:21 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VbaLT-0002MG-QD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 19:18:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53807 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VbaLT-00022G-1z for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:18:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53752) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VbaLK-00021E-61 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:18:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VbaLC-0001Vh-Sb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:18:10 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:39187) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VbaLC-0001Vd-Pe for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:18:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VbaLC-00009d-Dd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:18:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 18:18:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 15746 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 15746-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B15746.1383157043545 (code B ref 15746); Wed, 30 Oct 2013 18:18:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 15746) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Oct 2013 18:17:23 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53205 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VbaKZ-00008j-3B for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:17:23 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:35666) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VbaKX-00008Y-4l for 15746@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:17:21 -0400 Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id r9UIHKBX008596; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:17:20 -0400 Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 21C32B42FC; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:17:20 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <089d6db9-1a1c-4f33-a999-7fd063e7e772@default> (Drew Adams's message of "Wed, 30 Oct 2013 07:07:57 -0700 (PDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV4747=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9362 : core <4747> : inlines <191> : streams <1065098> : uri <1580889> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:79788 Archived-At: > No. There still should be two different commands. Updating a > bookmark should not always require interacting with a confirmation > query. You don't need to interact: since you know you're updating a bookmark, you just hit RET RET at the end instead of a single RET, without paying attention to the prompt that might be displayed. Stefan