From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] master 11cf3e9: Implement a new function directory-files-recursively Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 12:23:25 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20141209062121.9440.90058@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <87ppbrpfx4.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1418318643 30172 80.91.229.3 (11 Dec 2014 17:24:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 17:24:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Thierry Volpiatto To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 11 18:23:56 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xz7T1-0005eL-W4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 18:23:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52765 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xz7T1-0004vM-I1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 12:23:55 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56306) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xz7Sg-0004uw-0K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 12:23:41 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xz7SY-0000Mr-Hy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 12:23:33 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:27613) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xz7SY-0000Mm-Eb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 12:23:26 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjsPAOwQflRFxIoH/2dsb2JhbABbgweDYIVaxR0EAgKBJBcBAQEBAQF8hAMBAQMBViMFCws0EhQYDSSISgnWWQEBAQEGAQEBAR6QbweESAWLAaQugXiCN4FiIYJ3AQEB X-IPAS-Result: AjsPAOwQflRFxIoH/2dsb2JhbABbgweDYIVaxR0EAgKBJBcBAQEBAQF8hAMBAQMBViMFCws0EhQYDSSISgnWWQEBAQEGAQEBAR6QbweESAWLAaQugXiCN4FiIYJ3AQEB X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,502,1413259200"; d="scan'208";a="100205922" Original-Received: from 69-196-138-7.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.196.138.7]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 11 Dec 2014 12:23:25 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id AC8EF262D; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 12:23:25 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Thu, 11 Dec 2014 15:40:25 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:179804 Archived-At: > Stefan, is `file-name-all-completions'+`file-symlink-p' still 10x faster > than `directory-files'+`file-directory-p'? As long as the file-symlink-p call is only made for directories, it shouldn't affect the speed very much. Stefan