From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Contributing LLVM.org patches to gud.el Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 09:48:59 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1423320552 1044 80.91.229.3 (7 Feb 2015 14:49:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 14:49:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: slewsys@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Richard Stallman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 07 15:49:11 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YK6h4-000513-34 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 15:49:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53274 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YK6h3-000835-IL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 09:49:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52180) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YK6gz-00082U-Oi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 09:49:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YK6gy-0006TV-Ud for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 09:49:05 -0500 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:42452) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YK6gv-0006T1-AP; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 09:49:01 -0500 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id t17Emx1l015562; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 09:48:59 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 50EDEFAA; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 09:48:59 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Sat, 07 Feb 2015 07:44:22 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV5210=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9393 : core <5210> : inlines <2048> : streams <1386298> : uri <1849046> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:182607 Archived-At: > This question is a small part of a big issue which is more or less bad. > I want to find out what it is, and think about it. Please do not ask > me to rush to a conclusion without finding out what is happening. Take your time. But whatever you find out is irrelevant to whether or not the Emacs maintainer will accept LLVM support into gud.el, at least as long as I'm the maintainer. Stefan