From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20231: 25.0.50; package.el mangles non-ascii content in downloaded archive-contents data Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 10:02:59 -0400 Message-ID: References: <6343E9EC-9E23-4D44-9CD1-82C26DB7CDA3@sanityinc.com> <8292DA72-0898-47B2-A1C1-F7D94A52A437@sanityinc.com> <878udysfn2.fsf@violet.siamics.net> <83mw2eecne.fsf@gnu.org> <874momsbsi.fsf_-_@violet.siamics.net> <83egnqe9a9.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1428934011 2023 80.91.229.3 (13 Apr 2015 14:06:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 14:06:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: steve@sanityinc.com, Ivan Shmakov , 20231@debbugs.gnu.org To: Artur Malabarba Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 13 16:06:38 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Yhf0T-0003LO-Bt for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 16:06:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52000 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yhf0S-0003qC-6j for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 10:06:32 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50458) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yhey6-0000OD-Qe for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 10:04:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yhey2-0006Tc-Ml for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 10:04:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:37064) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yhey2-0006Sf-KB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 10:04:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yhey2-0003Ot-3d for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 10:04:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 14:04:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20231 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 20231-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20231.142893381613040 (code B ref 20231); Mon, 13 Apr 2015 14:04:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20231) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Apr 2015 14:03:36 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55073 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YhexX-0003OC-Nc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 10:03:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mercure.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.24.67]:39612) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YhexS-0003Nz-Ge for 20231@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 10:03:31 -0400 Original-Received: from hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.50]) by mercure.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C1D45CE1B; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 10:03:24 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from lechon.iro.umontreal.ca (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBCE31E5B99; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 10:02:59 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: by lechon.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id A8C48B4122; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 10:02:59 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Artur Malabarba's message of "Mon, 13 Apr 2015 13:31:22 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-DIRO-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-DIRO-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-DIRO-MailScanner-SpamCheck: n'est pas un polluriel, SpamAssassin (score=-2.82, requis 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -2.82, MC_TSTLAST 0.00) X-DIRO-MailScanner-From: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:101472 Archived-At: >> It is also slower. Again, I have no idea if speed matters in this >> case. > I vote for the fastest approach. Now that package-refresh can be done > in the background, any post-processing done in the foreground is all > the more noticeable by the user. Either way is fine by me. Just one detail, tho: if you let-bind coding-system-for-read, please only do it around the call to insert-file-contents and not around the subsequent code (even if it's short and seems not to matter). Stefan