From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Don't complain about changed file when it hasn't changed Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2016 13:50:09 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1473184043 20341 195.159.176.226 (6 Sep 2016 17:47:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 17:47:23 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 06 19:47:19 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bhKSp-0004Ud-S9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2016 19:47:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35267 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bhKSn-0000SC-KS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2016 13:47:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53820) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bhKSh-0000Rk-8v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2016 13:47:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bhKSc-0004Ad-Cl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2016 13:47:06 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:43205) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bhKSc-0004AY-94 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2016 13:47:02 -0400 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.7/8.14.1) with ESMTP id u86HliLo024476; Tue, 6 Sep 2016 13:47:44 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 50A47601EA; Tue, 6 Sep 2016 13:50:09 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (John Wiegley's message of "Tue, 06 Sep 2016 09:29:27 -0700") X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV5789=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9418 : core <5789> : inlines <5186> : streams <1696295> : uri <2283381> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:207215 Archived-At: > Stefan, what is the performance impact of this change, and how often > will that cost be paid? If you look at the code, you'll see that it is only called when the previous behavior would have been to prompt the user. I'm sure you've already bumped into those prompts, but I'd be really surprised if you've bumped into them frequently enough to be worried about their impact on battery life. Stefan