From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Revisit patch for Bug#11935? Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2016 12:44:23 -0500 Message-ID: References: <661e36f7-2a24-d7f3-f7d2-f1ef98216f5b@cs.ucla.edu> <8337i2l6ns.fsf@gnu.org> <4dc47b62-7cfb-09c9-e036-e11c857c76f3@cs.ucla.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1480959984 9135 195.159.176.226 (5 Dec 2016 17:46:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 17:46:24 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 05 18:46:19 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cDxLG-0001RV-PA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2016 18:46:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43629 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cDxLJ-0006PV-8x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2016 12:46:21 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35476) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cDxJe-0005Ug-1K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2016 12:44:38 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cDxJZ-0004NY-2V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2016 12:44:38 -0500 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=46834 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cDxJY-0004N0-SX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2016 12:44:32 -0500 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cDxJR-0002Q1-W6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2016 18:44:25 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 8 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:4NG4RuNTBgJjTQqhA6Bijju4t00= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:210076 Archived-At: > If those "optimized out"s are an obstacle we should report them to the GCC > developers. Really? Last I tried -Og they were so pervasive that it seemed very clearly like a conscious decision on the part of the GCC maintainers. Stefan "using -O0 with most/all checks enabled, all the time"